Skip to content
Notis
All automation tools

Notis vs Flowise vs Langflow

Historical comparison. Flowise is shut down or no longer current.

Verdict

Notis aside, Flowise has the highest support score, 79% across all 33 rows. Langflow scores 77% across 30 checked rows out of 33.

Their strengths differ: Flowise for combining AI agents with human checkpoints and Langflow for rolling automation out to a team.

None of them documents Workflow versioning or Audit logs and compliance.

Only Notis documents Schedule trigger and App-event trigger.

Capabilities and pricing

Capability comparison between Notis and the selected automation tools
Capability
FlowiseVisit site
LangflowVisit site
Build & trigger
Visual workflow builder—
Build workflows with natural language—
Schedule trigger——
App-event trigger——
Webhook or API trigger
Email, form, or manual triggerManual: Test button / chat command
Logic & orchestration
Conditional branches—
Loops and batch processing—
Data mapping and transforms—
Custom code stepsPartialVia skills' scripts/, not a code step
Reusable subflows—
Long-running workflows
AI & human control
AI model steps
Autonomous agents
Knowledge bases or RAGUltra-tier memory sources
Browser or computer use—
MCP support
Human approval steps—Partial
Reliability & operations
Retries and error paths—PartialPartial
Run history and logs
Testing and debuggingTest button fires a real run on demand
Workflow versioning———
Monitoring and alerts—Partial—
Secret managementMasked env vars + encrypted tokens
Platform & governance
Ready-made app integrations1,000+ apps
Workflow templatesPartialSingle-prompt automation templates
Managed cloudPartialNot checked
Open source—
Self-hosting—
SSO and role-based access—PartialNot checked
Audit logs and compliance———
Shared team workspaceNot checked
Usable free tierPartial
PriceFREEPRO$13/moyr (rate on a yearly commitment)+2 moreTiers not collectedOpen Source / DesktopFree

IncludedPartial— Not documentedNot checked

Ranked by support score

1. Flowise

AI workflow automation

Visual AI-agent and workflow builder; official operations ended on 31 August 2026, with Apache-2.0 source retained for forks.

Best for: combining AI agents with human checkpoints

Documented strengths

  • Logic & orchestration: Conditional branches, Loops and batch processing, Data mapping and transforms, Custom code steps, Reusable subflows and Long-running workflows
  • AI & human control: AI model steps, Autonomous agents, Knowledge bases or RAG, Browser or computer use, MCP support and Human approval steps
  • Platform & governance: Ready-made app integrations, Workflow templates, Open source, Self-hosting, Shared team workspace and Usable free tier

The catch

The gap is workflow builders and triggers, with nothing documented for Build workflows with natural language, Schedule trigger and App-event trigger.

Pricing

Tiers not collected

End of life: 31 August 2026. Apache-2.0 source remains available for forks. The homepage still displays historical Cloud Free/Starter/Pro prices of $0/$35/$65 per month; these are not asserted as a current supported commercial offer. · free tier available · flowiseai.com

How it differs from Notis: A modular visual AI stack combining model nodes, document retrieval, tool-calling agents and human input; now an unsupported archived project rather than an active hosted recommendation.

Flowise alternativesSupport score: 79% across all 33 rows

2. Langflow

Visual AI workflow builder

Build and deploy AI agents and MCP servers with visual flows and Python components.

Best for: rolling automation out to a team

Documented strengths

  • Logic & orchestration: Conditional branches, Loops and batch processing, Data mapping and transforms, Custom code steps, Reusable subflows and Long-running workflows
  • Platform & governance: Ready-made app integrations, Workflow templates, Open source, Self-hosting and Usable free tier
  • Build & trigger: Visual workflow builder, Build workflows with natural language, Webhook or API trigger and Email, form, or manual trigger

The catch

The gap is AI and approval controls, with nothing documented for Browser or computer use.

Pricing

Open Source / DesktopFree

Open-source MIT server and Desktop are free. Supply your own model access and infrastructure; current vendor-cloud access and subscription pricing are unresolved. · free tier available · github.com

How it differs from Notis: An MIT-licensed visual Python workflow builder with model, tool, RAG and MCP components you run on your own machine or server.

Visit LangflowLangflow alternativesSupport score: 77% across 30 checked rows out of 33

3. Notis

Personal AI assistant

Notis is a personal AI assistant you message from WhatsApp, iMessage, Telegram, Slack or email, and reach from your own coding agent through its MCP server.

Best for: building and triggering workflows

Documented strengths

  • Build & trigger: Build workflows with natural language, Schedule trigger, App-event trigger, Webhook or API trigger and Email, form, or manual trigger
  • AI & human control: AI model steps, Autonomous agents, Knowledge bases or RAG, Browser or computer use and MCP support
  • Reliability & operations: Run history and logs, Testing and debugging and Secret management

The catch

The gap is workflow logic, with nothing documented for Conditional branches, Loops and batch processing, Data mapping and transforms and Reusable subflows.

Pricing

FREEPRO$13/moyr (rate on a yearly commitment)PRO+$39/moyr (rate on a yearly commitment)ULTRA$99/moyr (rate on a yearly commitment)

Free–$149/mo · help.notis.ai

See Notis pricingSupport score: 56% across all 33 rows

Questions about this comparison

Which of Flowise or Langflow scores highest in the evidence checked so far?

Flowise, with 79% across all 33 rows. Langflow scores 77% across 30 checked rows out of 33.

How much do they cost?

Flowise: End of life: 31 August 2026. Apache-2.0 source remains available for forks. The homepage still displays historical Cloud Free/Starter/Pro prices of $0/$35/$65 per month; these are not asserted as a current supported commercial offer; Langflow: Open-source MIT server and Desktop are free. Supply your own model access and infrastructure; current vendor-cloud access and subscription pricing are unresolved. These prices are not directly comparable, so we do not rank them.

Which of them can I try for free?

Flowise and Langflow have a free tier.

What can none of them do?

None of them documents Workflow versioning or Audit logs and compliance.

Where does Notis fit in?

Notis is number 3 on this page. Against Flowise: A modular visual AI stack combining model nodes, document retrieval, tool-calling agents and human input; now an unsupported archived project rather than an active hosted recommendation.

How we checked

We checked each product's official pages against the same 33 capability rows. The support score is the share of checked rows a product documents. Partial support counts half, and rows not checked yet stay out of the score. Notis chose the rows and is scored the same way. The score does not measure reliability, reply speed or writing quality. Last checked 21 August 2026.

Sources

Spotted something out of date?

Tell us what changed, or which tool we are missing.

Describe the workflow and Notis runs it

Connect your tools, then review every trigger, approval and run.